Those cons who cried for the Bye-Bye 2010, because of the skit on the Commission Bastarache , will need now to recognize that the torque-Darling Plateau was right on target with this sketch which tells the favorite phrase is: "A Commission of Inquiry can distract people per day, while he stuffs them!" !
As expected, in his report, Justice Michel Bastarache is no blame John James Carrion and says that the version of Marc Bellemare can not be proven !
Come on!
Between you and me, if fundraisers PLQ had no qualms about going Chantal Landry, in his office And, even less, to call the Deputy Minister of Justice, asking for a "back lift" is that they knew it was going like this and because they had the green light!
As expected, in his report, Justice Michel Bastarache is no blame John James Carrion and says that the version of Marc Bellemare can not be proven !
Come on!
Between you and me, if fundraisers PLQ had no qualms about going Chantal Landry, in his office And, even less, to call the Deputy Minister of Justice, asking for a "back lift" is that they knew it was going like this and because they had the green light!
Otherwise they would never have done that and they would have kept little paper embarrassment, right?? If Charles Rondeau and Franco Fava also led off because they knew they had the right to conduct as broad and because it allows them to carry as wide! However, Justice Bastarache not blaming any Premier Carrion! Bizarre
!
Public hearings have been learned, says the journalist Jean-Jacques Samson, the Liberal Party had literally laid hands on the device Quebec public! The Charles Rondeau fundraiser and manager of Montreal's liberal organization, Violette Trepanier, attended many sessions, the same offices of Jean Charest, Chantal Landry, a former organizer who became responsible for appointments , to the Prime Minister! They
chose thousands of liberals who have invaded the public!
We have also learned that applications from aspiring judges circulated, more extended, since 2003, Ms. Landry annotating the same HP, according to political affiliation candidates!
We knew at least one judge asked, to an elected Liberal intercede with Master Bellemare, to gather the position he occupies now!
This is not nothing!
All these revelations are greatly harmful to the Charest government, certainly does not included in the plans of Jean Charest, when he established the Commission of Inquiry then! This proved to be a big political mistake which has dug even deeper, the pit of that government, during the fall!
Opponents of Jean Charest, who accuse him of having burned $ 6 million in this parody, can at least console himself, saying he has become the biggest loser on the political front! ! The People's Court had already ruled in favor of Master Bellemare, even before the start of public hearings and in premium, the Liberals are in the foot, with the unearthing of their partisan maneuvers!
These are not the doubts that have been sown, the reliability of the testimony of Mr Bellemare, who will overturn the verdict of the people !
Jean-Jacques Samson could have added the Case Stephane Handfield that erupted after the public hearings of the Commission Bastarache , as well as the scoop of William S. Leduc's blog The analysts who found an article that dated 2003 and which contradicts the testimony of Chantal Landry, as well as that of John James Carrion !
!
Public hearings have been learned, says the journalist Jean-Jacques Samson, the Liberal Party had literally laid hands on the device Quebec public! The Charles Rondeau fundraiser and manager of Montreal's liberal organization, Violette Trepanier, attended many sessions, the same offices of Jean Charest, Chantal Landry, a former organizer who became responsible for appointments , to the Prime Minister! They
chose thousands of liberals who have invaded the public!
We have also learned that applications from aspiring judges circulated, more extended, since 2003, Ms. Landry annotating the same HP, according to political affiliation candidates!
We knew at least one judge asked, to an elected Liberal intercede with Master Bellemare, to gather the position he occupies now!
This is not nothing!
All these revelations are greatly harmful to the Charest government, certainly does not included in the plans of Jean Charest, when he established the Commission of Inquiry then! This proved to be a big political mistake which has dug even deeper, the pit of that government, during the fall!
Opponents of Jean Charest, who accuse him of having burned $ 6 million in this parody, can at least console himself, saying he has become the biggest loser on the political front! ! The People's Court had already ruled in favor of Master Bellemare, even before the start of public hearings and in premium, the Liberals are in the foot, with the unearthing of their partisan maneuvers!
These are not the doubts that have been sown, the reliability of the testimony of Mr Bellemare, who will overturn the verdict of the people !
Jean-Jacques Samson could have added the Case Stephane Handfield that erupted after the public hearings of the Commission Bastarache , as well as the scoop of William S. Leduc's blog The analysts who found an article that dated 2003 and which contradicts the testimony of Chantal Landry, as well as that of John James Carrion !
Personally, this inability to believe Carrion is strengthened when I see that his underlings were, literally, tensed at the sight of the Report Bastarache, as Adolf Hitler when he signed the treaty of capitulation of France in 1940, in the same car where the 1918 Armistice was signed, embodying thus the German defeat in the First World War, all in one place !
Like many others, I followed the Commission Bastarache! I saw a duel between David and Goliath and even, on occasion, it was more like a duel between David and Goliath (Hello, Master Suzanne "Pitbull" Side! You alright ???)!! ! To see Mr. Bastarache blush, during the work of the Inquiry, it was obvious he had a course that was pre-determined and should comply! This has probably been true for the relationship appears not to have been written by one man !
If swallows entirely, the report Bastarache, it appears that Marc Bellemare is a liar, his former deputy minister who supported his claim, Georges Lalande, was too old to be credible, that the floppy disk that had been found at the last minute by his wife, did not deserve to be watched and that the meeting with Carrion did not matter, but the opponents were telling the truth under oath, and without exception!
Yet I wonder about this: since Marc Bellemare to fabulous, why the process of appointing judges should be revised and, more importantly, on the same points of dissatisfaction that were highlighted by the testimony of Charles Rondeau, by the testimony of Franco Fava, the testimony of Chantal Landry (the famous post-it where she writes the political allegiance of judicial candidates) and Marc Bellemare himself who, incidentally, had never applied for Commission of Inquiry into the appointment process for judges, eh??
Would it be possible that he told the truth about the pressures he would undergo, as well as the influences of fundraisers PLQ, in appointing judges, eh??
But then, who lied?? It is quite a problem to solve it! The recommendations were made by Bastarache, are proof that there was a wolf in sheep's clothing! Even he was able to see it! However, John James Carrion has not been censured, but we have the strong impression that the process had many flaws, he knew them, and worse, that he endorsed! Misery!
The problem of collusion or the problem of descent should not be limited to one process of appointing judges! What happens there, in other sectors, such as, for example, the Boards of Directors of Crown corporations, huh?? Is it pure or is it the same thing?? There is no reason for anyone, to brag! The allegations have not been believed! Why?? To appeal to that, eh ??
Bastarache would it have been influenced by his liberal family, huh??
Michel Bastarache has a long record of liberal who is very well stocked! When he was appointed judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, Jean Chretien, in 1997, the opposition had questioned the then Liberal government of this former office colleague of Jean Chrétien, when both worked at the firm Lang Michener lawyers &! Michel Bastarache is someone who is very close to Jean Chretien and is very close to the Liberal Party of Canada! He was even the co-chairman of the National Committee for the Yes side in the referendum on the Charlottetown Accord in 1992!
is this man who was chosen personally by John James Carrion, to investigate the Bellemaregate, and it is the same John James Carrion has, too, chose the lawyers who were task of defending his corruption! In short, it was a commission of inquiry that was puppet vassal to Carrion, who was introduced by Carrion and who was there to serve the interests of Carrion!
Anyway, bravo for Ethics and Transparency !
Like many others, I followed the Commission Bastarache! I saw a duel between David and Goliath and even, on occasion, it was more like a duel between David and Goliath (Hello, Master Suzanne "Pitbull" Side! You alright ???)!! ! To see Mr. Bastarache blush, during the work of the Inquiry, it was obvious he had a course that was pre-determined and should comply! This has probably been true for the relationship appears not to have been written by one man !
If swallows entirely, the report Bastarache, it appears that Marc Bellemare is a liar, his former deputy minister who supported his claim, Georges Lalande, was too old to be credible, that the floppy disk that had been found at the last minute by his wife, did not deserve to be watched and that the meeting with Carrion did not matter, but the opponents were telling the truth under oath, and without exception!
Yet I wonder about this: since Marc Bellemare to fabulous, why the process of appointing judges should be revised and, more importantly, on the same points of dissatisfaction that were highlighted by the testimony of Charles Rondeau, by the testimony of Franco Fava, the testimony of Chantal Landry (the famous post-it where she writes the political allegiance of judicial candidates) and Marc Bellemare himself who, incidentally, had never applied for Commission of Inquiry into the appointment process for judges, eh??
Would it be possible that he told the truth about the pressures he would undergo, as well as the influences of fundraisers PLQ, in appointing judges, eh??
But then, who lied?? It is quite a problem to solve it! The recommendations were made by Bastarache, are proof that there was a wolf in sheep's clothing! Even he was able to see it! However, John James Carrion has not been censured, but we have the strong impression that the process had many flaws, he knew them, and worse, that he endorsed! Misery!
The problem of collusion or the problem of descent should not be limited to one process of appointing judges! What happens there, in other sectors, such as, for example, the Boards of Directors of Crown corporations, huh?? Is it pure or is it the same thing?? There is no reason for anyone, to brag! The allegations have not been believed! Why?? To appeal to that, eh ??
Bastarache would it have been influenced by his liberal family, huh??
Michel Bastarache has a long record of liberal who is very well stocked! When he was appointed judge of the Supreme Court of Canada, Jean Chretien, in 1997, the opposition had questioned the then Liberal government of this former office colleague of Jean Chrétien, when both worked at the firm Lang Michener lawyers &! Michel Bastarache is someone who is very close to Jean Chretien and is very close to the Liberal Party of Canada! He was even the co-chairman of the National Committee for the Yes side in the referendum on the Charlottetown Accord in 1992!
is this man who was chosen personally by John James Carrion, to investigate the Bellemaregate, and it is the same John James Carrion has, too, chose the lawyers who were task of defending his corruption! In short, it was a commission of inquiry that was puppet vassal to Carrion, who was introduced by Carrion and who was there to serve the interests of Carrion!
Anyway, bravo for Ethics and Transparency !
Besides Bastarache the Commission is not the Commission of Inquiry que souhaitent avoir les Québécois!!! Ce qu’ils souhaitent, et à juste titre, d’ailleurs, c’est une Commission d’enquête publique et indépendante sur la corruption et sur la collusion, au Québec , à l’image de ce que fut la célèbre CECO qui, n’en déplaise aux Christian Rioux de ce monde , avait été très utile, pour la suite des choses, à l’époque !
While the various construction unions are beginning to play the cards on the table, thanks to the admission of the outgoing president of the FTQ-Construction, Yves Mercure, who said that organized crime gangrene, from top to bottom and from left to right, the construction industry, and it is apparent even in trade unions in enterprises , not to mention the resignation of CEO CCQ, André Ménard, as a result of allegations of interference in some surveys which are sensitive and the latest discovery of the ADQ has discovered that companies that are friends with the PLQ are favored in awarding government contracts , this Inquiry will be much more relevant than the BOI puppet that was the infamous Commission Bastarache!
0 comments:
Post a Comment